Installing SQL Reporting Services

Hello New to SQL Server and SQL Reporting Services need some help with the
install of reporting services want to know if it can be installed on a
different machine then the SQL Server as do not which to install IIS on the
database server.if this can be done is there any documation on it.
Thanks
JohnYes this is supported. During setup you are prompted for the database
server name and this does not have to be local. You should know that this
does require a new license for this machine.
--
-Daniel
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"John Bonin" <JohnBonin@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:529BDC64-BA26-4464-91E2-B74052C529C6@.microsoft.com...
> Hello New to SQL Server and SQL Reporting Services need some help with the
> install of reporting services want to know if it can be installed on a
> different machine then the SQL Server as do not which to install IIS on
> the
> database server.if this can be done is there any documation on it.
> Thanks
> John|||Does this mean that you need a SQL Server license for the machine - if the
SQL Server installation on the remote machine is a processor license, what
are the implications for licensing on the machine where Reporting services is
installed?
"Daniel Reib [MSFT]" wrote:
> Yes this is supported. During setup you are prompted for the database
> server name and this does not have to be local. You should know that this
> does require a new license for this machine.
> --
> -Daniel
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
> "John Bonin" <JohnBonin@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:529BDC64-BA26-4464-91E2-B74052C529C6@.microsoft.com...
> > Hello New to SQL Server and SQL Reporting Services need some help with the
> > install of reporting services want to know if it can be installed on a
> > different machine then the SQL Server as do not which to install IIS on
> > the
> > database server.if this can be done is there any documation on it.
> >
> > Thanks
> > John
>
>